Comments on NT/History Blog: Paul's Letters - Does Their Sequence Matter?

Bill "(Did that make sense, Amos?)" Ye...

2009-11-11T10:31:08.308-06:00

Bill

"(Did that make sense, Amos?)"

Yes fully. Well maybe a little. I'm not so sure. Nope.

Starting to feel kinda blue... {;o(... and,
I'm getting blue in the face trying to understand.

"it's a difference of two mentalities."

Context and what?

Why only two? Could there be more than two?

Unbalanced? How?

Maybe, once in a blue moon,
you can just answer the question so i can get it.

"Maybe, in simple words please,
you can explain why the order matters."

I know it's usually me, your humble blog student,
who's talking a blue streak.

But - try writing a few extra real words.
It won't hurt. I doubt if your fingers will turn black and blue from the extra typing. Okay!

Strong-arm tactics designed to discourage any a...

2009-11-11T05:52:55.089-06:00
Strong-arm tactics designed to discourage any attempt at reconstruction (or any attempt to study Paul's epistles based on a tentative reconstruction) should be academically (and perhaps faith-ic-ally) inexcusable.

Well said, Bill. And thanks for getting some of us to your blog from that fascinating and now-long discussion at T.C.R.'s blog.

Amos - it's a difference of two mentalities. ...

2009-11-10T16:40:27.700-06:00
Amos - it's a difference of two mentalities. Is context to help us grasp theological points? Or do all the details add up to a beautiful story? Both can be true, but I think we're extremely unbalanced.

TC - You're probably right. It's like arguing over what BLUE is. Obviously, there are shades of blue. Unfortunately, some people's idea of "context" is a pretty pale 'blue'. That makes it tough to show what you SEE, when there's no other word to use except "blue".

(Did that make sense, Amos?)

Thanks for the ongoing discussion, both of you.

Bill, Nice post. Thanks for the mention. I don...

2009-11-10T15:16:24.974-06:00
Bill,
Nice post. Thanks for the mention.

I don't think anyone is really denying the importance of the big picture or story.

Bill "Our capacity for reconstruction is deb...

2009-11-10T15:04:00.909-06:00
Bill

"Our capacity for reconstruction is debatable. Strong-arm tactics designed to discourage any attempt at reconstruction (or any attempt to study Paul's epistles from a tentativereconstruction) should be academically (and perhaps faith-ic-ally) inexcusable."

huh?

What did you say?

Read the thread at newleaven.

You guys are way to smart for me.
I have to look up way to many words.
And I still don't know what you're trying to say.

I'm sure it's excellent, if I could only understand it.

It's not my fault, really, i have a polish uncle who taught me everything i know.

Now you know my major disability. ;-)

Maybe, in simple words please, you can
explain why the order matters.

By the way, you made some good points of why they should still read Pagan Christianity.

But will they? Hmmm?