The Synoptic Gospels tell us God was pleased with Jesus at his baptism. Therefore, any Synoptic claim about what pleases God may serve as implicit testimony about Jesus' life in Nazareth. For example:
If we repeat the assumption from post #1, that God's reward implies God's pleasure, then we may invert at least the following portions of Matthew's 6th chapter as historical reconstructions: When Jesus lived in Nazareth, it was customary for him to give to the poor, but he did it secretly. Often times Jesus would go into a room, close the door, and pray to his Father in secret. And sometimes Jesus would fast, but he kept his face washed and put oil on his head so that nobody could tell, except for the Father. In Nazareth, the Father saw Jesus do these things, probably for many years, and the Father was pleased with his Son.
Now, let's consider this argument.
The third point is of course repeated from post #1 and the earlier points are phrased very similarly in the passage. We may note once again that Matthew contrasts Jesus here with the Pharisees and characterizes this larger section of teaching as coming from one who spoke with authority <exousia>.
Incidently, this is the first time Matthew uses this word and four of its other eight uses come soon after this (7:29 => 8:9, 9:6, 9:8, 10:1). However we nuance and build our understanding of power/authority, I will simply suggest this much. The word means someone had the right to do something and/or the ability to do something. Matthew is saying Jesus had the right and/or the ability to teach these things. So if the crowds (and Matthew) believed Jesus was able to teach these things, is there any chance they believed Jesus was unable to do them? I think not.
Given these complimentary principles of power and sincerity in his teaching, we can probably justify inverting all of Matthew 5-7 as a valid reconstruction of Jesus' personal life. However, to date those behaviors to before his baptism, according to our arguments so far, we would also need to characterize the entire Sermon on the Mount as one complete teaching on how to please God. That can probably be done very easily, and may have been done before, but I'm not prepared to build and present that argument myself at the moment.
(Unless: if the SOTM is a condensed rendering of Jesus' Halakah, then it primarly addresses how to obey God's commandments, and doing what God commands is one third of our definition for pleasing Him.)
Just to be clear, I am in fact suggesting Matthew did intend the entire Sermon on the Mount not only as instructions for his readers but also as a reflection of Jesus' own disciplines. But the real problem for our purpose here is that after we justify that position (and date it pre-baptism), some details will be more challenging to invert and reconstruct from than others. We'll go through these in time, but for now, in this series, we'll take baby steps.
For all of these reasons, for now, let's keep things simple and stick with the principle at top. We are looking for behaviors and attitudes specifically offered, according to Matthew, as ones that God likes, that God wants, or that God commands. We have also added things that God "rewards".
It's very important to go slow, take our time, and be very careful we do not assume things. We should work very hard to sense out the boundaries between proving what are Matthew's direct implications and what might only be the sloppy, eager insertions our own preferred inferrences. However, if the argument at top is valid, we now have at least three personal habits/behaviors for Jesus in Nazareth. We have giving, prayer, and fasting, all done in secret and focused on the Father - that's not a bad start at all. We hereby claim these details (and possibly much more to come) as early biographical data purposely embedded in Matthew's testimony through direct implication.
I don't know about you, but I hear the Lord's "silent years" growing slightly louder.
To be continued...
This is my sandbox. I keep promising to do actual scholarship.
At least this is here: "new ideas, free to good homes"
At least this is here: "new ideas, free to good homes"
NT/H Blog Archives
- ► 2012 (73)
- ► 2011 (72)
- ► 2010 (263)
- Classical Journal on Ancient Literacies
- After These Messages...
- The New Revolution
- Historiography on the Gospels
- Event Sequencing: John's Beheading
- How Many Shipwrecks?
- Think Different
- Schooling Time
- The Promise of Nazareth - 2
- Exceptional Shared Items
- The Promise of Nazareth - 1
- Pop Quiz on Paul
- Historical Positivity & Damascus
- The Joys of Jesus
- Blessed are the Pitiful?
- Yes, Yes, Ye... Siiigh
- Capernaum & Conversations on Old Posts
- Everybody Happy?
- Thought for the Day
- The Joys of Being Jesus
- Perspective on James, not New Enough
- Timeline of Western Thought
- More Beatitude Sandboxing
- Just, Righteous, Rightwise
- Lament and be Summoned
- Jesus the Ascetic?
- Chess vs. Backgammon
- Beggars before the Spirit - 3
- The new A-fili-ation
- Beggars before the Spirit - 2
- Beggars before the Spirit - 1
- Brushing Up
- The Apostles' Teaching
- Dating Paul's Conversion
- Reflections of Nazareth - 2
- My Royal "We"
- How Did Jesus Live?
- Jesus on the Mount
- Reflections of Nazareth - 1
- Dealing with Nazareth - 9
- Dealing with Nazareth - 8
- Dealing with Nazareth - 7.5
- SuperMan? SuperPuppet? SuperFan.
- Ancient Literacy ~ Internet Literacy
- Blogger's Bias - True Confession
- Thank You, Rocky Branch
- Appointing Elders: Barnabas vs. Paul
- ▼ September (49)
- ► 2008 (83)
- ► 2007 (19)
On chronology, that is. By me, of course. ;) This post comes because of a paragraph I just read in which James D.G. Dunn provides a nearly ...
It takes an awfully good pastor to be better than no pastor at all.
Is there a comprehensive list of these, anywhere? I sure can't find one online. Google keeps giving me bad apologetics sites and a Wikip...
At least once in his public ministry, somewhere, Jesus said to some people: "Unless you turn around and become like little children, y...
Joseph, Mary and the boys (James, Joseph, Simon & Jude) moved to Capernaum with Jesus after the wedding in Cana. The Lord's sisters...
My main interest in Lysanias, tetrarch of Abilene, began in hopes of finding a comparative case study (however minuscule) to make with Hero...
My answer, in 2 paragraphs, an exercise suggested by Brian LePort: After nearly a decade of apostle-ing churches, having founded at leas...
Marcus Borg wants to see the New Testament's 27 documents rearranged "based on contemporary mainstream biblical scholarship" a...
There are only two things I know of on this earth that are ever lived in or filled by the Spirit of God: our souls, and His Word. Countless ...
If context is king, then irony is queen. Sometimes you can't tell which one wields more authority. Sometimes she likes it that way. Then...