If anyone wants us to be perfectly literal about 1 Tim 2:12, we should note, at least as a beginning, that Paul is primarily speaking against one-on-one mentoring, female to male. "I do not allow a woman to teach or to direct a man." Everything in this statement is entirely singular. In other words, according to the strictest possible interpretation of 1 Tim 2:12, Paul could have approved of Priscilla teaching Apollos, because the prudent woman had her husband assist as she explained the way of God to a transient single male. (There's a sister with wisdom, eh?)
Ah, but the context! Verses 13 & 14 are clearly negative toward women, aren't they? Again, strictly speaking, they're negative toward one woman. Eve. So - at the very least - before we debate how broadly Paul expected Timothy to apply these statements, it's worth noting that vv. 13 & 14 keeps everything singular in number. In explaining his strict directive against one-on-one female-to-male discipleship, Paul reviews the case of the very first such case.
Whatever else Paul is saying, Eve & Adam were a particular one-on-one partnership, in which he followed her right into sin. In other words, Paul's illustration retains the singular intimacy of his prohibition. This may not be a coincidence. The male/female intimacy of a one-on-one discipling relationship may be all Paul is really afraid of.
Could it really be just that simple? Let's try to dig a bit harder.
This is my sandbox. I keep promising to do actual scholarship.
At least this is here: "new ideas, free to good homes"
At least this is here: "new ideas, free to good homes"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
NT/H Blog Archives
-
▼
2009
(354)
-
▼
December
(42)
- Classical Education
- Quotes of the Year
- Following Jesus
- Myers-Briggs Typology
- I know it's a good vacation
- Gifts of Xmas
- A decree went out in those days...
- Did Luke err on Quirinius? Does it matter?
- Top Post of 2009
- Ten Books of my 2009
- Ancient Jewish House found in Nazareth
- Everybody gets a hug and a tee shirt
- 1 Tim 2 - Index and Summary
- More Gender and Number - 1 Tim 5:8
- Angels are really smart
- Nazareth "46"
- Let's Quarantine all the Defective People
- A Chronological Reconstruction: 1 Tim 2, Ephesus ...
- A Chronological Reconstruction: 1 Tim 2 and Colos...
- Gender and Number in 1 Tim 2 - Part 7
- Gender and Number in 1 Tim 2 - Part 6
- Gender and Number in 1 Tim 2 - Part 5
- The Christmas Story: Luke vs. Matthew?
- Churches need Coaches
- Gender and Number in 1 Tim 2 - Part 4
- Honebeaded Tismakes
- Gender and Number in 1 Tim 2 - Part 3
- The McCauley Omnicom
- Gender and Number in 1 Tim 2 - Part 2
- Solstice Time is Here
- Gender and Number in 1 Tim 2 - Part 1
- Seminarians on History and the Gospels
- Owa Tafoo Lameye
- Tyndale's Manga Bible
- Inerrancy and Tradition
- Did Paul's Rhetorical Skills Develop?
- Academic Link Love
- B.S. Numbers: Dates vs. Citations
- What is a Christian?
- Cassandrian Wall in Vergina, Greece
- Year-by-Year Archive Page
- Structure: Design vs. Longevity
-
▼
December
(42)
Recently Popular
-
On chronology, that is. By me, of course. ;) This post comes because of a paragraph I just read in which James D.G. Dunn provides a nearly ...
-
It takes an awfully good pastor to be better than no pastor at all.
-
Is there a comprehensive list of these, anywhere? I sure can't find one online. Google keeps giving me bad apologetics sites and a Wikip...
-
At least once in his public ministry, somewhere, Jesus said to some people: "Unless you turn around and become like little children, y...
-
My main interest in Lysanias, tetrarch of Abilene, began in hopes of finding a comparative case study (however minuscule) to make with Hero...
-
Joseph, Mary and the boys (James, Joseph, Simon & Jude) moved to Capernaum with Jesus after the wedding in Cana. The Lord's sisters...
-
My answer, in 2 paragraphs, an exercise suggested by Brian LePort: After nearly a decade of apostle-ing churches, having founded at leas...
-
There are only two things I know of on this earth that are ever lived in or filled by the Spirit of God: our souls, and His Word. Countless ...
-
Marcus Borg wants to see the New Testament's 27 documents rearranged "based on contemporary mainstream biblical scholarship" a...
-
A famous six word short story makes a quick and easy first test case for my latest ideas. Legend says Ernest Hemingway wrote this to settle ...
1 comment:
Never really looked at it that way-- "one on one".
But,if Paul would have said, "I do not allow women to teach men...", and if we were to use the same strict understanding that you are using here, wouldn't we have to read it as "I do not allow a plurality of women to teach a plurality of men..."?
Too me, it just sounds weird either way.
Not throwing out what you are suggesting, just wondering if I'm tracking with you.
I don't know enough about language in general to criticize much here anyway... but I am very interested in seeing where you go from here on the issue.
Post a Comment